- 4 days ago
- 3 min read
10,000lb, 1,569 Miles, 100% Electric

We put the Chevrolet Silverado EV to the test—towing nearly 10,000 pounds of Solar Stations across 1,569 miles of mountains, deserts, cities, and coastlines to get from Grand Junction to Earth Day Santa Barbara. After sharing the climate story and mission behind our journey to Earth Day Santa Barbara, we figured it was time to answer the question everyone kept asking us along the way:
“But… how did the truck do?”
To find out, we documented the entire experience: the charging stops, the efficiency, the surprises, the lessons learned, and what living with an electric truck on a long-haul trip actually feels like.
This wasn’t a controlled test track or perfectly optimized scenario. It was a real road trip with real weight, real charging infrastructure, and real curiosity about where transportation is heading next.
The Truck & The Stats

Okay… time to geek out.
We drove the Chevrolet Silverado EV a total of 1,569 miles through mountains, deserts, cities, and coastlines while towing approximately 10,000 pounds.
And honestly? We were impressed.
The truck handled the load confidently and delivered more power than we expected. Even climbing grades and merging onto highways while towing, the Silverado EV rarely felt strained.
Power-wise, this truck felt comparable to a modern turbo-diesel pickup, but with more instant torque available from a standstill. It pulled our 10,000-pound, un-aerodynamic load up the steepest grades with ease. It also had plenty of mid-grade power to re-accelerate to the speed limit after getting slowed down by a 30-mph tractor-trailer. Not once during the entire journey did Glen—Skyhook’s electrical engineer, resident truck expert, and driver for this adventure—wish the Silverado EV had more power.
But with great power comes great responsibility. While the truck effortlessly climbed a 6% grade with the cruise set at 65 mph, our battery state of charge (SOC) silently slipped away as the system sent 250+ kilowatts of energy to the traction motors. Combined with a stiff headwind, consumption averages shot up to over 3300 Wh/mile. Simply dropping our speed to 55 mph on the grade cut our energy consumption significantly—often by as much as 50%.
When heading back down these passes, regenerative braking from the electric motor was significantly more effective than a diesel exhaust brake. We rarely needed the friction brakes, even when descending steep mountain passes or navigating stop-and-go traffic. Not only did this prevent heat and wear on the trailer brakes, it also recharged the truck's battery bank. On one downgrade, we noted a 3% (6 kWh) battery SOC gain.
However, Glen noted two key areas where the vehicle’s towing abilities could be improved.
Improvement 1: A ¾-Ton Version with Higher GVWR and Tow Rating
When loading an equipment trailer, it is very easy to surpass this vehicle's 1,000-pound tongue weight rating. We actually had to leave some equipment behind on this trip because of this limitation. Factory literature suggested a load-distributing hitch system is required at the 10,000-pound towing capacity limit. While these hitches are common for recreational travel trailers, they are rare on equipment trailers. In fact, our local trailer shop could not install one on our trailer due to interference with the hydraulic lowering system. Glen has towed this exact trailer with many ¾-ton pickups over the years with zero tongue weight issues.
Perhaps the inability to use a load-distributing hitch was a blessing in disguise, as it would have added complexity when disconnecting at charge stops. This brings us to Glen’s second needed improvement.
Improvement 2: A Front-Mounted Charge Port
In many cases, pull-through EV chargers were unavailable, forcing us to use standard EV fast chargers situated at the front of a parking space. Because the Silverado’s charge port is located on the bedside (where a traditional gas cap would be), the cord from the front of the spot could not reach the port when nosing in. The only workaround was to disconnect the trailer and back the truck into space.
Electric pickups do not share the same packaging constraints as internal combustion engine trucks with liquid fuel tanks, so why not move the port to the front? A front-mounted port would have eliminated 90% of our trailer disconnects. We could have simply nosed the pickup into the charging spot. At most stations, there was plenty of room behind the truck for the trailer to extend into the aisle without blocking traffic, or along a curb where the trailer could sit parallel out of the way.

Of course, towing dramatically impacts efficiency. Charge stops were frequent, especially in mountain terrain or at higher freeway speeds. But the experience also proved something important:
Heavy-duty EV towing is no longer theoretical. It’s here.



